|
|
The
Official Website of S. C. Lomax
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Reviews
of My Books
The following are just a few of the many comments I have
received about my books on Jeremy Bamber and the Barry George case. If you
would like to make comments about my books then feel free to do so. I enjoy
hearing from those who read my work. Reviews of Jeremy Bamber: Evil, Almost Beyond
Belief? ‘fantastic reading’, ‘wonderful’ For a review by leading campaigning journalist Bob Woffinden,
of my Jeremy Bamber book, please click here Mrs F. O - I have finished your book
and it is wonderful. Congratulations once again, Scott - I think the ***** Mr D.B. Just finished the Jeremy Bamber book-
fantastic reading ***** Mrs P. S. I
have just finished reading your book Bamber. I must say I found it
fascinating, I am a avid reader I look
forward to reading your future publications ***** Reviews of my Barry George books 'A must read ... fantastic', 'Very
good', 'Great book', 'Fascinating', 'An extraordinarily competent piece of
work', 'carefully researched ... meticulous', 'riveting reading' For
media reviews and comments please visit the 'What The Media Has Said' section
of this website Trashionista website (a ‘chick-lit’ site
reviewing books: Justice for Jill isn't
simply a history of the case, its author, Scott Lomax, also firmly believes
that George is innocent and sets out the evidence fairly and in minute
detail. It's a fascinating, compelling and deeply upsetting book. It's not a sensationalist
"true crime" style book and, as such, can get a bit dense, but it's
not a book that you'd read for entertainment, obviously. If you're interested
in the case, in law, in miscarriages of justice, it's a must-read. But expect
to have your faith in the criminal justice system shaken. ***** Graham
Ball of the Express newspaper: 'I think
the case you make for Barry George is compelling and an extraordinarily
competent piece of work from someone of your age.' *****
***** Mr J. V. ‘I have just finished reading 'Justice for Jill', and
would like to congratulate you on an extremely
well researched book. One of the few books I have read in recent history
and was reluctant to put down.’ ***** Mr T. A.: I
enjoy reading I
am coming to the end of "Justice for Jill" ...and wanted to
congratulate you on:
I enjoy detail
...your level of detail is rarely seen. Again congratulations..and thanks *****
***** M
Kinnear from ***** C
M Macneil' from the USA: 'The case of the Crown vs. George has been compared to the American
case of the People vs. (O.J.) Simpson, the ex-professional football player
charged in the truly gruesome murders of his ex-wife and a man who had the
fatal misfortunate of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. If there
are any parallels in the two cases, they certainly end with their verdicts:
whereas Simpson was acquitted, George wasn't. For the non-Brit unfamiliar
with the case, author Scott Lomax poses some troubling - if not fearsome -
possibilities that Barry George may be a wrongfully convicted man for more
than a couple of reasons, chief among them a "threshold" criminal
investigation fuelled by a public outcry for conviction, and a media that
might have predisposed public opinion to a presumption of George's guilt. If
the chance that a wrongfully convicted man remains imprisoned exists, its
tragedy is compounded by another of Lomax' theories: that the victim, TV
personality Jill Dando, might not even have been the intended victim and her
killer presumably remains at large. Lomax risks much - professionally and
personally - in this expose that doesn't pander to the public's presumption
of guilt and instead takes a courageous stand to challenge it. If Lomax is
correct that the elements of a "miscarriage of justice" converged
to convict an innocent man, George's case is a shameful commentary on the
investigative, court and jury systems, and it demands reversal. In an
American courtroom, the evidence against George as Lomax dismantles it would
- hopefully - constitute reasonable doubt, thereby requiring acquittal.
There's plenty of reasonable doubt about George's guilt in Lomax' book, and his work deserves not only a read by
those still enthralled by the Dando case but by the architects of a very,
very possible unjustice to her convicted killer.'
*****
*****
*****
***** Mr
J.H.R., |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Website created by
S. C. Lomax in September 2004. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||